Attribution for AI-mediated and cross-boundary writes: what was produced, when, by which agent (human or non-human), from what inputs, and -- for generated text -- which verbatim source passage each statement rests on. Used standalone against a produced resource, and contained in an AI-suggestion review Task against the suggestion contained alongside it.
The profile's synthesized-accessor contract: fields TypedFhir surfaces as first-class typed properties, each computed from the instance by a restricted FHIRPath expression. See Salient Fields for what they are, how they shape LLM contexts, and how to declare them.
An activity is something that occurs over a period of time and acts upon or with entities; it may include consuming, processing, transforming, modifying, relocating, using, or generating entities.
Comments
Deliberately unbound. R4's example binding (provenance-activity-type) does not anticipate AI-mediated authorship -- draft-generated, AI-suggested, human-accepted -- and asserting it would mis-describe the data. Treat the activity vocabulary as open and read activity.text, which is what the examples carry. A validator run against the base spec will warn that no code was supplied; that warning is expected here.
Preferred over recorded as THE date. A provenance written asynchronously (a queued write-back) has a recorded well after the action; dating the action to the bookkeeping timestamp misplaces it in every timeline.
Expression
occurredDateTime | occurredPeriod.start | recorded