{
  "resourceType": "CodeSystem",
  "status": "draft",
  "content": "fragment",
  "name": "DiagnosticReportCategoryCS",
  "id": "diagnostic-report-category",
  "title": "Diagnostic Report Category CodeSystem",
  "description": "Local classifications for a diagnostic report, carried in `DiagnosticReport.category` where the\nstandard diagnostic service section vocabulary has no concept for the distinction.\n\n**Additive, never a replacement.** A report carrying one of these codes also carries its standard\nservice-section category, as a separate `CodeableConcept` in the same repeating element. A reader\nthat does not know this system still reads the report correctly; a writer that omits the standard\ncategory in favour of this one does not.\n\n**Content is a fragment.** One concept is declared here, and this system is not a closed vocabulary:\na report may carry a code from it that this specification does not list. Match the codes you know\nand pass through the ones you do not.\n\n**Codes are case-sensitive** and are matched exactly, system and code together. Matching on the code\nalone will collide with unrelated vocabularies.\n\n**Nexus EMR writes this today at `http://well.company/diagnostic-report-category`\n(FHIR-371)**: it is live in stored `DiagnosticReport.category` codings and in code, and is under\nmigration to the canonical declared here. Write the canonical; expect both until the migration\ncompletes, and match both addresses exactly rather than deriving one from the other.",
  "url": "https://fhir.apps.health/CodeSystem/diagnostic-report-category",
  "concept": [
    {
      "code": "point-of-care",
      "display": "Point of care",
      "definition": "DEPRECATED -- write SNOMED CT `405262001` |Point of care testing| instead. The result was produced in the clinic, on a device at the point of care, rather than by a laboratory. The report is still categorised as a laboratory report by its standard service-section code; this says where the measurement was actually made. Consequences a reader should expect: there is no lab accession number and no external reporting facility, and the performer is the clinic staff member who took the measurement rather than a laboratory. THE PUBLISHED CODE SAYS THE SAME THING: SNOMED CT already defines this concept, `DiagnosticReport.category` is 0..* with an EXAMPLE binding, and an example binding admits any coding -- so the SNOMED coding is conformant today and needs no local system and no profile change. Retained because stored reports carry this code and it must stay representable.",
      "property": [
        {
          "code": "status",
          "valueCode": "deprecated"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "experimental": false,
  "caseSensitive": true,
  "property": [
    {
      "code": "status",
      "uri": "http://hl7.org/fhir/concept-properties#status",
      "type": "code",
      "description": "Concept lifecycle status (active | deprecated | retired)."
    }
  ]
}